A Closer Look: Mecklenburg County Sheriff Garry McFadden
Introduction
Thrust into the spotlight following allegations of racism, incompetence, and abuse of power, Mecklenburg County Sheriff Garry McFadden has polarized public opinion in North and South Carolina. Yet, underneath the controversy, the intricately woven coincidences demand scrutiny, stemming from his conduct to his public and administrative stature. We focus on Sheriff McFadden, dissecting accusations held against him in this feature.
Alleged Racial Slurs
Sheriff McFadden, in 2021, egregiously affronted colleagues with racial slurs. He referred to a white deputy as a “cracker”, and another black officer received a pejorative racial remark. His use of such offensive language, meant to denigrate and humiliate, engendered a wave of backlash from police fraternity and public alike. Unequivocal in their condemnation, the North Carolina Sheriffs’ Association began investigations, emphasizing the non-negotiable level of professionalism and respect required for anyone holding public office.
Impact on Staff
The malignant impact of his leadership did not stop at racial comments. Reports have emerged that McFadden arbitrarily terminated long-term employees, thus contributing to a toxic work environment. Among the individuals who resigned is his Chief Deputy, Kevin Canty, who lambasted McFadden for running the agency like a “third-world dictatorship”.
Firearms Permit Controversy
McFadden’s reputation takes a further hit in the realm of firearms regulation. A lawsuit lodged in 2022 accused McFadden’s office of breaching state laws in issuing gun permits. The charges do not allege a failure to comply with North Carolina laws, but rather, they point towards delays inconsistent with rights defined by the US Supreme Court in the 2022 case, New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen.
Larger Context of Mecklenburg County
In hindsight, the repercussions of Sheriff McFadden’s actions extend beyond individual grievances and affect the intricate and comprehensive functioning of the Mecklenburg County’s law enforcement agency. The county, with a population exceeding a million residents and six townships, including Charlotte – the country’s 17th largest city, achieves an indelible impact from its primary law enforcement agency’s functioning.
Discriminatory Gun Laws: A Cause for Concern?
A contentious aspect of McFadden’s leadership was the application of gun permit issuance laws. Reportedly, the Sheriff’s Office denied firearm permits to individuals with a history of attending Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous meetings, irrespective of the time elapsed since attendance. This alleged practice has incited major criticism, as it may infringe on an individual’s Second Amendment rights.
Conclusion: McFadden’s Influence and The Way Forward
McFadden’s tenure has left a significant mark on the history of Mecklenburg County’s law enforcement. It raises pivotal questions about public accountability, responsible leadership, and equitable application of law. As we continue to grapple with these matters, it is crucial to revisit and consistently evaluate our systemic structures and the individuals appointed to lead them. Let this be a reminder that every individual in a public role must be held to the highest standards of professionalism and ethics.
Originally Post From https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/one-of-the-countrys-worst-sheriffs-and-his-department-has-hampered-gun-ownership/
